FujiFilm FinePix S8650 Pictures

From what I could see online there's not many sample pics for the FujiFilm FinePix S8650. So I thought I'd post a few. The FinePix S8650 is a good camera overall, with 16 mega pixels and a decent 36x zoom. It takes normal AA batteries. This has its good and bad points. But, to be honest, I do prefer a camera that comes with its own rechargeable battery. It's just more convenient for me. These pictures are straight from the camera but have been made smaller. No other editing or enhancing has been done. I will add though. Filming video with this camera is OK, but not great. The autofocus seems quite slow, but the quality is pretty good. However, it is an older bridge camera, and was never really anything more than a basic entry level model anyway, so don't expect too much from it in that regard if comparing it to some of the 1080p / 4K capable bridge camera options available today. It does have a bit of potential for snapping some decent pics though.


Crow_or_Raven_FujiFilm_FinePix_S8650

How are my Birding skills. This Crow [or is it a Raven?] visits my garden everyday for food. And he is very clever. Any hard bits of food he comes across, he dips them in the water bowl. And sometimes, depending on how hard the food is, he leaves them in the water for around a hour to soften it up.


pigeon_tree_FujiFilm

Pigeon at a far zoom


elderberrys

Elderberries


black-cat_fence_FinePix_S8650_Picture

Black and white cat on a fence. He's a good little hunter for mice this one.



squirrel_FinePix_S8650_sample_image

What do you want from me, more food? One of the many Squirrels that live in my garden and gets fed nuts most of the day. I keep promising not to feed them but always end up giving in.


Be Careful With SD Card Camera Adapters

Not really sure whether to blame the adapter or just its age. I'm not sure how old it was, as I think it came included with an older digital camera I bought a few years back. But yeah, a word of warning. Check the plastics of the adapter every now and then to ensure that it hasn't become loose / broken. Because that's exactly what just happened to mine. The plastic at the top where the connectors are has broken away and made the SD card adapter become stuck inside the camera. I tried to take it out but it would only budge enough to release itself from the spring clip that secures it inside the camera. So I pushed it back in hoping it would become unstuck, but it didn't do the trick. In the end I had to forcibly remove it from the slot.


broken_SD_card_Adapter_Motorola

The tops gone

The result: the camera is broken. The connector pins inside the SD card slot of the camera have been bent out of shape, and now the camera won't even turn on. With it being in such an enclosed space, there's not much chance of bending them perfectly back into shape and reconnecting them without opening the camera up. And even with opening the camera up, I don't think it will be easy and there's no guarantee of being able to repair it. I might try and fix it as some point though when I get some time. Shame really that it broke, because I liked this camera. The Samsung WB500 has served me well over the years. Was working just fine before this. Taken out by a dodgy SD adapter. 


bent_camera-SD-card-pins

Inside the cameras SD slot. All bent out of shape.


My own fault I guess. I should have checked it more thoroughly beforehand. Anyway, I'm just thankful that it was an adapter and not a normal SD card. At least I can easily take the smaller card out of the broken adapter and save all the images that were on there. If it would have been a normal card that had broken like this it would have been much more difficult to extract the pictures from the card. And normal cards, mostly the cheaper ones, do break exactly like this adapter did, so be careful.




What Is This Near The Moon

A week or so back I was outside at around 3am - 4am taking some pictures of the moon with my old 5 mega pixel Panasonic TZ1. I was messing about with it to see how close it could capture the moon. It wasn't very close. You can see that post here. Then, because I never used the digital zoom, only the optical, I wanted to take some pics again, but this time use the full 40x zoom - optical + digital combined. Turns out it was terrible. Very hard to hold still by hand and the results show no close up detail of the moon at all, which is no surprise. Anyway, it wasn't until I was looking through the photos that I noticed something weird near the moon, an object.

When I took the pictures I remember seeing an object near the moon, but at the time it just looked like a star, so I didn't think much of it. Upon viewing the images again one of them stood out. And ironically it was the one shot I kind of took by accident. It was a zoomed out shot. But it has ended up being the most interesting.

 

What-Is-This-Near_The_Moon

The Moon on a cloudy night with an unknown object overhead


It shows an object above the moon to the left. It looks like an orange arrow or squiggle. When enlarged it looks like it could be a UFO, or an energy source of some sort. Now, I'm not claiming this is an Alien UFO, as I have no idea what it is. But I was looking at some pictures of star formations to see what could be near the moon at the time I took the pictures, and its possible that it could be planet Venus, Mercury or the Arcturus star. Is that what it is? And my old camera is picking it up as some strange looking UFO / anomaly? Or could it be something else. This image is genuine, straight from the camera. It has not been faked or enhanced.


star_planet_or_aliens


Nothing Unique


I will add. I have seen this type of "UFO" before, reported by other people. Some call them flying serpents. The colour and length varies. There is footage online. More info. I went outside again in the early hours and took some more shots with the same camera of the same object that I believe is more than likely a star or a planet. They all came out similar to this one. Whatever it is, with the Lumix TZ1 It shows up as an orange energy source. This star, planet, UFO, or whatever it might be is always there. So it must be something known to those who study the sky / space.


star_or_demonic_entity


Update


When I have the time I'm going to take more photos of this thing with other cameras and compare the results. I did that last night with the Panasonic TZ3 and a Samsung WB500. The results were fairly similar. However some came out like white lines rather than orange. Conclusion: I believe its just the camera(s). The far zoom combined with a slowish shutter speed makes any slight of hand / movement pick some things up as lines and squiggles rather than their true form. Including stars and planets. What are your thoughts. Comment and let me know.




10x The Moon TZ1

I know I know. An old Panasonic Lumix 5 mega pixel point and shoot camera with a 10x optical zoom has no chance of getting a good close up picture of the Moon. But I've been looking at lots of Moon footage, pictures and video recently that has been taken with Nikon's and a Panasonic with excellent zooming capabilities, so its got me curious. I thought I'd see how close the Panasonic TZ1 could get. Just an experimental test. And the result. While laughable in comparison, it gives a little insight in to just how great the zooms are on the Panasonic FZ80 and Nikon big zoom bridge camera "P" series.


moon-test-lumix-dmc-tz1

Picture: The Moon at full optical zoom, which is 10x. The Lumix TZ1 can go all the way to 40x zoom if digital is applied. But that wasn't used for this picture. Maybe next time when the sky Isn't so cloudy like it is tonight and there's a full moon I'll try. Digital zoom was off at the time of taking this pic, and it never even crossed my mind at the time to turn it on. It was late. The Moon @ 10x optical with the TZ1 just looks like a white ball of light. Hehe.




Nikon Coolpix P900 Lowest Prices

If you're looking to find lowest price possible for the Nikon P900 you will have to settle for a camera that is second hand or refurbished. There are some out there for sale that are used but in like new condition. Problem is, by all accounts the P900 has been discontinued, so unless you get lucky and find someone or an outlet selling one that's never been taken out the box, used it will have to be. But this can be a good thing because a brand new one being sold will have everyone after it anyway, so if the listing is open for bidding and not buy it now, chances are you won't get it for a low price. Anyway, I've looked around, especially on eBay, and this camera is no cheaper on there than it is on Amazon. The cheapest listing I found for this camera was here on Amazon. And it is cheap.


beaver-p900-closeup-nikon_giving_the_eye

A beaver not impressed with how well the P900 can pick up his beady little eye


The P900 is certainly the model that you will find cheapest out of their super zoom cameras, but there are other models such as the P950 and P1000 that should definitely be considered. They are newer and more expensive, but both offer a further zoom length [125 x optical] than the P900 and more updated technology.

However, all of them are good for long range photography, and any of them will do you well for astrophotography, wildlife, birding, ship spotting, UFO hunting [although infrared can be an annoyance], and just about anything else that requires a far zoom range. Also worth mentioning about These Nikon's. Everyone always talks about how great the zoom is, but the macro ability with zero or minimal zoom applied is also very good on all three models. And if using something like a Raynox DCR-250 attachment, it takes the macro to a whole new level. There has been talk and rumours regarding an upgrade to the Nikon P line, called the P1100. Nothing has been confirmed yet, though, and no valid release date finalised. You can find out more information about its supposed specification here.




Trending...